Sunni and Shia

Origins, anatomy, diffusion. Three long reads that try to explain the divergence without taking a side, and that say plainly where the evidence runs out.

Share
Sunni and Shia, a three-part series
A three-part series

Origins, anatomy, diffusion. Three long reads that try to explain the divergence without taking a side, and that say plainly where the evidence runs out.

New to the Qur'an, or to this series? Start with The Qur'an: What It Is, How It Came Down, and How It Was Kept, then read Muhammad ﷺ: A Life. All articles: Deen: Start Here.

I

The three parts

Each stands on its own. Read them in order if you want the argument to build; jump straight to whichever question brought you here if not.

II

How this is written

Three commitments govern all three parts, and they are worth stating before you start.

Both sides in their own terms

Where the traditions read the same verse or hadith differently, both readings are given as their own scholars would state them, and no verdict is appended. Where one tradition rejects a report the other accepts, that is stated rather than smoothed over.

Sources labelled by provenance

A report from Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī is a Sunni canonical source.7 One from al-Kāfī is a Twelver canonical source.811 A date from al-Ṭabarī is third-century historiography with its own problems.12 Every hadith carries a collection and number you can check.10

The limits are marked

Contested dates say so. Figures that circulate widely but are weakly sourced are named as such and not repeated. Where a causal story is modern scholarly inference rather than documented event-history, the text says which it is. None of it is a fatwa: on any question of belief or practice, ask a qualified scholar of your own tradition.

The correction that reorganises everything

Nobody at the Prophet’s funeral belonged to a sect

What existed in 632 was a political crisis, then a civil war, then a set of unresolved arguments about authority.4 Only across the following two to three centuries did those arguments harden into two traditions with their own hadith canons, legal systems, theologies and rituals.5679

Reading the schism backwards into 632 is the most common error in popular accounts, on every side. Said plainly, because these pages give both traditions their own terms everywhere else: this historicist framing is itself a frame, not the view from nowhere. Each tradition holds that its own position is what the Prophet ﷺ left and the other is the departure, and neither concedes the account below.

III

What is actually counted

One figure to set expectations before you read any percentage anywhere in this series, or anywhere else.

The top bar is Pew's estimate, compiled from censuses, surveys and expert sources. Everything below it is not, and the figure says so in its own encoding. Pew measured only the Sunni/Shia split, and gave it deliberately as a range.1 That measurement is from 2009 and has never been repeated: it is still Pew's most recent global Sunni/Shia estimate, which is worth knowing before you cite it as current.2 Pew's 2025 update puts the world's Muslims at 2.0 billion in 2020 and still gives no Sunni/Shia breakdown.3 No census of madhhab affiliation exists in any country at all, so the lower bar is hatched throughout: treat the order as meaningful and the exact widths as not.

↔ Scroll the figure sideways

IV

Sources

The works behind the few claims made on this page. Each part of the series carries its own, much longer, numbered list.

Demography

  1. Pew Research Center, Mapping the Global Muslim Population (7 October 2009): Sunni 87–90%, Shia 10–13%
  2. Pew, Sunni and Shia Muslims (2011)
  3. Pew Research Center, “Countries with the most Muslims and global Muslim population change, 2010–2020” (9 June 2025): 2.0 billion Muslims in 2020, with no Sunni/Shia breakdown

How the traditions formed

  1. Wilferd Madelung, The Succession to Muhammad: A Study of the Early Caliphate (Cambridge University Press, 1997)
  2. Marshall G. S. Hodgson, The Venture of Islam, vol. 1: The Classical Age of Islam (University of Chicago Press, 1974)
  3. Christopher Melchert, The Formation of the Sunni Schools of Law, 9th–10th Centuries C.E. (Brill, 1997)
  4. Jonathan A. C. Brown, The Canonization of al-Bukhārī and Muslim (Brill, 2007)
  5. Moojan Momen, An Introduction to Shiʿi Islam: The History and Doctrines of Twelver Shiʿism (Yale University Press, 1985)
  6. Hossein Modarressi, Crisis and Consolidation in the Formative Period of Shiʿite Islam (Darwin Press, 1993)

Primary texts

  1. Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī · Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim · Sunan Abī Dāwūd · Jāmiʿ al-Tirmidhī · Sunan al-Nasāʾī · Sunan Ibn Mājah · Musnad Aḥmad, every number here is checkable at sunnah.com
  2. al-Kulaynī, al-Kāfī · Ibn Bābawayh al-Ṣadūq, Man lā yaḥḍuruhu al-faqīh · al-Ṭūsī, Tahdhīb al-aḥkām and al-Istibṣār · Nahj al-Balāgha, texts at al-islam.org
  3. al-Ṭabarī, Taʾrīkh al-rusul wa'l-mulūk; in English, The History of al-Ṭabarī, vol. 9: The Last Years of the Prophet, trans. Ismail K. Poonawala (SUNY Press, 1990), which carries the Saqīfa narratives
Cite this page

Siddiqui, M. “Sunni and Shia: origins, anatomy, diffusion.” mohammadsiddiqui.com.

Part of a three-part series on the origins, anatomy and diffusion of the Sunni–Shia divergence. Where a causal story is scholarly inference rather than documented event-history, it is marked as such.
↑ Top